It seems my argument was with the assumption of psychological egoism, rather than ethical egoism when I went into my rant back in the day:
http://www.wingedleopard.net/wlwlv1/?view=522
It makes more sense to me now, less of what I said is what is consistent with what I think.
p.s. philosophy doesn't get old.
http://www.wingedleopard.net/wlwlv1/?view=522
It makes more sense to me now, less of what I said is what is consistent with what I think.
p.s. philosophy doesn't get old.