here i am. are you on mm?
---
photos from model mayhem
gross (screenshot)
awful (screenshot)
snake (screenshot)
ugh (screenshot)
ahh (screenshot)
worst (nsfw screenshot)
--
they give you three chances for getting your account approved. as a photographer on the site, you are supposed to have four photos using different models and different locations, as well as a biography. i was rejected the first two times, and i don't know why. my photos were good, and my biography was intact. i put up four completely different photos, and i finally was approved the third time.
--
the quality of mm is awful. the website itself isn't very good. everyone seems pretty unprofessional, but i guess that's why they are on mm. most of the photographers are simply terrible. some lack basic knowledge, others lack taste (they have what i would deem pornography).
the bozeman area only has 23 female models on mm. i've already shot two of them, with whom i made contact independent of mm. so i don't think i'll gain much from the site. i was hoping to find some good people to shoot.
--
in conclusion, bleh.
--
p.s. the first time i applied was on aug 30, 2009. i was accepted on aug 30, 2010. how about that?!
---
photos from model mayhem
gross (screenshot)
awful (screenshot)
snake (screenshot)
ugh (screenshot)
ahh (screenshot)
worst (nsfw screenshot)
--
they give you three chances for getting your account approved. as a photographer on the site, you are supposed to have four photos using different models and different locations, as well as a biography. i was rejected the first two times, and i don't know why. my photos were good, and my biography was intact. i put up four completely different photos, and i finally was approved the third time.
--
the quality of mm is awful. the website itself isn't very good. everyone seems pretty unprofessional, but i guess that's why they are on mm. most of the photographers are simply terrible. some lack basic knowledge, others lack taste (they have what i would deem pornography).
the bozeman area only has 23 female models on mm. i've already shot two of them, with whom i made contact independent of mm. so i don't think i'll gain much from the site. i was hoping to find some good people to shoot.
--
in conclusion, bleh.
--
p.s. the first time i applied was on aug 30, 2009. i was accepted on aug 30, 2010. how about that?!
> worst
shit, you weren't kidding about the jean thong situation.
shit, you weren't kidding about the jean thong situation.
mm sucks but it's got the network effect going for them, but that's less useful in less populous areas.
hahaha that second one you posted is hilariously bad
interesting favorites.
oh.
i like them.
i like them.
I joined recently, too. There are an overwhelming number of awful photographers/models/people in general on here. :(
But I can't deny I'm getting lots of hits. Networking is networking!
But I can't deny I'm getting lots of hits. Networking is networking!
I've always wanted to be a model.
I can guarantee you would be better than a large portion of the male models on this site.
Imma be a model. Then Imma perfect "blue steel".
> lovely
at first i was like :) but then i was like :C
at first i was like :) but then i was like :C
I don't even know how you could be like :) at first
more like D:
more like D: